Head-to-Head Comparison
Continue.devvsSupermaven
Compare Continue.dev with Supermaven to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.
Continue.dev
Open Source Assistant • Intermediate
Open-source AI coding assistant with custom model integration and modular plugin architecture
Learning Time
2-3 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
76%
Top Advantages:
26K+ GitHub stars community
Custom AI model integration
Open-source with enterprise options
Supermaven
Code Assistant • Beginner
AI code completion with 300K-token context window and multi-language IDE integration
Learning Time
1 week to proficiency
Popularity
71%
Top Advantages:
300K-token context window
1M-token Pro plan capacity
Multi-language optimization
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Continue | Winner | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 76% | 71% | |
| Learning Curve | 2-3 weeks to proficiency | 1 week to proficiency | |
| Pricing | Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams | $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams | |
| Category | Open Source Assistant | Different | Code Assistant |
When to Choose Which Tool
Choose Continue When:
- You need open source assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams
Choose Supermaven When:
- You need code assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers beginner complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams
Bottom Line
Continue has higher industry adoption (76% vs 71%), but Supermaven might be better for specific code assistant needs.
Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats
Master Both Continue & Supermaven
Experience both Continue and Supermaven in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.
v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Available Cities
Get Updates
Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips