Head-to-Head Comparison

Devin AIvsOpenAI Codex

Compare Devin AI with OpenAI Codex to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.

Devin AI

Autonomous AgentAdvanced

Autonomous AI software engineer with agent-native IDE and interactive planning capabilities

Learning Time
1-2 months to proficiency
Popularity
67%

Top Advantages:

13.86% SWE-bench issue resolution rate
Agent-native IDE with planning boards
Autonomous Docker and deployment handling

OpenAI Codex

Code Generation ModelIntermediate

Foundation model powering GitHub Copilot with natural language to code translation and CLI tools

Learning Time
2-20 hours depending on usage
Popularity
96%

Top Advantages:

Powers GitHub Copilot ecosystem
Massive context handling capabilities
Multi-threaded task processing

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaDevinWinnerCodex
Popularity67%96%
Learning Curve1-2 months to proficiency2-20 hours depending on usage
Pricing$20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise customSimilar$1.50/1M input tokens, $6/1M output tokens
CategoryAutonomous AgentDifferentCode Generation Model

When to Choose Which Tool

Choose Devin When:

  • You need autonomous agent capabilities
  • Your team prefers advanced complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise custom

Choose Codex When:

  • You need code generation model capabilities
  • Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $1.50/1M input tokens, $6/1M output tokens

Bottom Line

Codex has higher industry adoption (96% vs 67%), but Devin might be better for specific autonomous agent needs.

Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats

Master Both Devin & Codex

Experience both Devin and Codex in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.

v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Get Updates

Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips