Head-to-Head Comparison

Devin AIvsSourcegraph Cody

Compare Devin AI with Sourcegraph Cody to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.

Devin AI

Autonomous AgentAdvanced

Autonomous AI software engineer with agent-native IDE and interactive planning capabilities

Learning Time
1-2 months to proficiency
Popularity
67%

Top Advantages:

13.86% SWE-bench issue resolution rate
Agent-native IDE with planning boards
Autonomous Docker and deployment handling

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise AssistantIntermediate

Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration

Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%

Top Advantages:

Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaDevinWinnerCody
Popularity67%72%
Learning Curve1-2 months to proficiency2-4 weeks to proficiency
Pricing$20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise customSimilar$9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise
CategoryAutonomous AgentDifferentEnterprise Assistant

When to Choose Which Tool

Choose Devin When:

  • You need autonomous agent capabilities
  • Your team prefers advanced complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise custom

Choose Cody When:

  • You need enterprise assistant capabilities
  • Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise

Bottom Line

Cody has higher industry adoption (72% vs 67%), but Devin might be better for specific autonomous agent needs.

Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats

Master Both Devin & Cody

Experience both Devin and Cody in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.

v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Get Updates

Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips