Head-to-Head Comparison

Sourcegraph CodyvsDevin AI

Compare Sourcegraph Cody with Devin AI to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise AssistantIntermediate

Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration

Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%

Top Advantages:

Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration

Devin AI

Autonomous AgentAdvanced

Autonomous AI software engineer with agent-native IDE and interactive planning capabilities

Learning Time
1-2 months to proficiency
Popularity
67%

Top Advantages:

13.86% SWE-bench issue resolution rate
Agent-native IDE with planning boards
Autonomous Docker and deployment handling

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaCodyWinnerDevin
Popularity72%67%
Learning Curve2-4 weeks to proficiency1-2 months to proficiency
Pricing$9/month Pro, $59/user/month EnterpriseSimilar$20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise custom
CategoryEnterprise AssistantDifferentAutonomous Agent

When to Choose Which Tool

Choose Cody When:

  • You need enterprise assistant capabilities
  • Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise

Choose Devin When:

  • You need autonomous agent capabilities
  • Your team prefers advanced complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $20/month Core (9 ACUs), Enterprise custom

Bottom Line

Cody has higher industry adoption (72% vs 67%), but Devin might be better for specific autonomous agent needs.

Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats

Master Both Cody & Devin

Experience both Cody and Devin in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.

v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Get Updates

Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips