Head-to-Head Comparison
Sourcegraph CodyvsSupermaven
Compare Sourcegraph Cody with Supermaven to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise Assistant • Intermediate
Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration
Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%
Top Advantages:
Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration
Supermaven
Code Assistant • Beginner
AI code completion with 300K-token context window and multi-language IDE integration
Learning Time
1 week to proficiency
Popularity
71%
Top Advantages:
300K-token context window
1M-token Pro plan capacity
Multi-language optimization
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Cody | Winner | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 72% | 71% | |
| Learning Curve | 2-4 weeks to proficiency | 1 week to proficiency | |
| Pricing | $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise | Similar | $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams |
| Category | Enterprise Assistant | Different | Code Assistant |
When to Choose Which Tool
Choose Cody When:
- You need enterprise assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise
Choose Supermaven When:
- You need code assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers beginner complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams
Bottom Line
Cody has higher industry adoption (72% vs 71%), but Supermaven might be better for specific code assistant needs.
Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats
Master Both Cody & Supermaven
Experience both Cody and Supermaven in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.
v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Available Cities
Get Updates
Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips