Head-to-Head Comparison

SupermavenvsCursor IDE

Compare Supermaven with Cursor IDE to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.

Supermaven

Code AssistantBeginner

AI code completion with 300K-token context window and multi-language IDE integration

Learning Time
1 week to proficiency
Popularity
71%

Top Advantages:

300K-token context window
1M-token Pro plan capacity
Multi-language optimization

Cursor IDE

AI IDEIntermediate

AI-native code editor built on VS Code with GPT-4 and Claude integration for intelligent coding assistance. Core development environment taught in vibe coding retreats.

Learning Time
2 hours (VS Code users) to 2-3 weeks advanced
Popularity
94%

Top Advantages:

Full codebase understanding and context
Multi-file refactoring capabilities
Natural language to code generation

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaSupermavenWinnerCursor
Popularity71%94%
Learning Curve1 week to proficiency2 hours (VS Code users) to 2-3 weeks advanced
Pricing$10/month Pro, $10/user/month TeamsFree Hobby, $20/month Pro, $40/user/month Teams
CategoryCode AssistantDifferentAI IDE

When to Choose Which Tool

Choose Supermaven When:

  • You need code assistant capabilities
  • Your team prefers beginner complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams

Choose Cursor When:

  • You want comprehensive AI-assisted development environment
  • Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: Free Hobby, $20/month Pro, $40/user/month Teams

Bottom Line

Cursor has higher industry adoption (94% vs 71%), but Supermaven might be better for specific code assistant needs.

Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats

Master Both Supermaven & Cursor

Experience both Supermaven and Cursor in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.

v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Get Updates

Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips