Head-to-Head Comparison
SupermavenvsSourcegraph Cody
Compare Supermaven with Sourcegraph Cody to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.
Supermaven
Code Assistant • Beginner
AI code completion with 300K-token context window and multi-language IDE integration
Learning Time
1 week to proficiency
Popularity
71%
Top Advantages:
300K-token context window
1M-token Pro plan capacity
Multi-language optimization
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise Assistant • Intermediate
Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration
Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%
Top Advantages:
Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Supermaven | Winner | Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 71% | 72% | |
| Learning Curve | 1 week to proficiency | 2-4 weeks to proficiency | |
| Pricing | $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams | Similar | $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise |
| Category | Code Assistant | Different | Enterprise Assistant |
When to Choose Which Tool
Choose Supermaven When:
- You need code assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers beginner complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $10/month Pro, $10/user/month Teams
Choose Cody When:
- You need enterprise assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise
Bottom Line
Cody has higher industry adoption (72% vs 71%), but Supermaven might be better for specific code assistant needs.
Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats
Master Both Supermaven & Cody
Experience both Supermaven and Cody in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.
v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Available Cities
Get Updates
Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips